View Full Version : USB or Firewire?
GilchrestThink13
11-16-2005, 05:41 PM
i have a USB cord only because i dont have a firewire port...all my friends have firwires and they use some of the same editing programs as i do but there video captures in a more clear quality...is this because im using a USB cord or is my computer just messed up?
Ienjoiskating
11-16-2005, 07:07 PM
firewire helps alot
d_n_b_and_d_u_b
11-16-2005, 07:20 PM
dude, computer help please.
Vivica
11-16-2005, 11:35 PM
firewire does = better quality...
firewire drops less data packets than usb, etc etc etc.... and firewire is better in almost every way...BUT, it really shouldn't matter for home video editing unless its a really low quality camera you won't notice much difference, any frankly your montors could be the reason it looks different!
it could be anything, USB is fine in my books...
I guess this would be more of a question for Vivica, but if anyone else knows the answer of course feel free to answer.
Is firewire faster then USB?
Vivica
11-17-2005, 01:20 PM
put simply... firewire...
but for really small amounts of data it REALLY does not matter in the slightest!
firewire uses a p2p style of transfer and drops very few packets, and because of the way it transfers its pretty fast and safe.
usb 2.0 uses more of a master-slave style of transfer, anybody who's played around with different hdd configurations will already know that if you have multiple master drives instead of a master and a slave it'll be alot faster, same deal with USB2.0 and firewire.
Vivica
11-17-2005, 01:24 PM
i've just looked up the read/write stats...
Read and write tests to the same IDE hard drive connected using FireWire and then Hi-Speed USB 2.0 show:
Read Test:
* 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0
* 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0
Write Test:
* 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0
* 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0
sums it up pretty nicely, and shows that really, for small amounts of data (for example a picture taken from a digital camera) it isn't a difference thats worth worrying about.
St. Jimmy
11-17-2005, 02:43 PM
Firewire, 400-800 mbps
USB, 480 mbps
Do the math.
Thanks.... i should have just googled... but hey. :p
St. Jimmy
11-17-2005, 03:08 PM
Thanks.... i should have just googled... but hey. :p
no problem, I know that right off the top of my head. weird, huh?
Vivica
11-17-2005, 11:17 PM
hahaha, St.Jimmy always made me laugh... firewire is often slower than USB2.0, 480 is higher than 400 after all... but yea, it all depends on a bunch of stuff.
and no, its not weird you just know that... go away.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.